You Talkin' To Me (1987) Trailer

Convicted Felon don't mean shit...

Global 6 hours ago 1 49 
It should be very complicated for any government entity to tell an American citizen he/she cannot sell their own personal property.
"CONVICTED FELON" sounds armed and dangerous however one should investigate what is now a state jail felony. Just about anybody can be a felon from simple possession of a controlled substance, trespass (Once a tort), then there is a financial problem and a father or ex husband cannot pay court ordered support to name a few.
Prison for profit and the so called "Family Code" reform of 1996 have done a lot to disarm America and of course the media beats the freedom drum always mentioning "CONVICTED FELON."
We the people are manipulated, lied to, spied on, our rights are being restricted and called privileges while our ruling elite routinely commit fraud, lie, abuse power, misuse government funds and resources and nobody says a word.
The voters even go so far as to re-elect these self serving egotists.
The words, convicted felon, do not signify a murderer, rapist or child molester anymore.
No, nowadays your convicted felons are mostly DUI, controlled substances, check fraud, criminal nonsupport, easy convictions as the offenders usually have no defense money so, guess what.
Guilty.
The convicted felon who should be feared will have an arm even inside the prison but the SCOTUS does not care about that because the real criminals never followed the law in the first place.

Prison for profit and the so called "Family Code" reform of 1996 have done a lot to disarm America and of course the media beats the freedom drum always mentioning "CONVICTED FELON."

We the people are manipulated, lied to, spied on, our rights are being restricted and called privileges while our ruling elite routinely commit fraud, lie, abuse power, misuse government funds and resources and nobody says a word.

The voters even go so far as to re-elect these self serving egotists.

The words, convicted felon, do not signify a murderer, rapist or child molester anymore.

No, nowadays your convicted felons are mostly DUI, controlled substances, check fraud, criminal nonsupport, easy convictions as the offenders usually have no defense money so, guess what.

Guilty.

The convicted felon who should be feared will have an arm even inside the prison but the SCOTUS does not care about that because the real criminals never followed the law in the first place.

Feminist writers are so besieged by online abuse that some have begun to retire?

Jasonhm
2/20/2015 11:28 PM CST
So let me clarify. Some people, men, white men that have every advantage are in reality complete failures and the lowest of the low, losers of the lowest order,bottom dwellers are somehow threatening and oppressing other people, professional feminist, ideologues many of which make a lucrative living pontificating on gender politics in well funded media outlets?

Well thankfully for these feminist have brave selfless online personae such as yourself that seek to save these damsels in distress from the grime fate of being subjected to criticisms and dissenting words of disagreement and even "shock" anger bellowed out by the nasty hobgoblins, evil inhabitants the bowls of the internet... Is this synopsis about right?

Now please who again is suffering from privilege and a sense of entitlement? Because I can pretty much guarantee that the fantastical neck bearded basement dwelling demons of whom you fantasize about slaying are projections of your own need to be seen as a useful protector and defender. Think a little about an article that in function encourages the behavior is asserts to be condemning? Who publishes a piece that essential says our ideological enemy is winning, that their tactics of intimidation are working? I oppose almost everything sensationalistic feminist are doing but I'm unable to view them with such utter disdain as so foolish and utterly stupid. Although I oppose them in nearly everything but I respect their intelligence enough not to see them as victims in a media format in which they are so clearly masters.

"We are going to destroy the Greek oligarchy system" | Channel 4 News

On the Sandbagging of Ross Ulbricht...

Travesty of Justice (Score:3, Insightful)

by Guy From V (1453391) on Wednesday February 04, 2015 @05:01PM (#48984033) Homepage

I've been following this trial for the last few weeks reading Ars, Wired, TechDirt and listening to Free Talk Live. The Judge basically hamstringed the defense ruling that they should only receive the prosecution's evidence against him...the weekend before the trial began. That right there is such a fundamental insult to the basic rights of any accused that should horrify and enrage anyone who believed in our justice system's impartiality. Add that to the fact that the judge allowed the the prosecution to use the accusations that Ulbricht hired assassins to be considered by the jury even though none of that has been proven or even competently investigated, that is a massive miscarriage of justice on stupendous levels that should frighten anyone living in the US. Evidence such as screenshots implicating his guilt that could have easily been forged were accepted without question....the list goes on. They also disallowed Andreas Antonopoulos, an expert witness on understanding how BitCoin and it's blockchain works to help the jury understand what they were hearing so to form a basis on how to poke holes in the Fed's story....this is almost a blatant showing of the corruption of our justice system and it's subservience to US intelligence services as the Snowden revelations. I'm not saying Ulbricht was innocent...I don't know that...but what happened in this trial was in no way anything but a kangaroo court on display in full form. Ulbricht's guilt is still up in the air, but our government was guilty of far worse crimes merely in that Manhattan courtroom the last 4 weeks.

Cody Wilson's War

Zamboni  ozlanthos • 13 days ago

What is so worrying about this is that the people who want to control Bitcoin don\t know even the most basic recent history; starting with the Holocaust, which apparently Gavin Andresen has not studied.

Your objection to Cody is that he appears smug, and this might put people off Bitcoin. I suspect you are British, as they specialise in hammering down the nail that sticks out. The fact is Cody is needed to counter the thinking of the legitimizers, who only have their own interests upper most.

You do not have to like the way he writes; the only thing that matters is that he is successful in destroying the legitimizers and their plans to cripple and wreck Bitcoin. Just as Linus Torvalds is a man known for being impatient with stupid people, Cody says what needs to be said no matter what the infantilised low brows want.

The Bitcoin enthusiasts childish, unmanly Sesame Street behaviour will only get the thing Bitcoiners love and are working on destroyed. Its time to tell the truth and put a stop to these ignorant men once and for all.

In Reference to: https://disband.it/253/so-we-all-agree/